Archive for the 'go' Category

feng yun wins ing as 2008 go congress enters yose

Saturday, August 9th, 2008

Feng Yun 9P defeated Yilun Yang 7P last night to win the 2008 Ing Masters tournament. The middle game featured a difficult fight, which prompted commentator Takemiya Masaki 9P to remark, “You shouldn’t have to try that hard. It’s better to think as simply as possible. Both players are too much into it — they want to win badly because it’s the final match.”
feng yun Here is Feng Yun reviewing the game of a congress participant during a lecture this afternoon.

computer defeats 8P go professional

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

A historic sign of the times occurred this afternoon when computer go program MoGo defeated Korean go professional Myungwan Kim 8P at the 2008 U.S. Go Congress in Portland OR. The computer played with a 9-stone handicap and won by 1.5 stones.

MoGo was written by French programmer Sylvain Gelly and ran on a borrowed European supercomputer with 800 CPUs. MoGo is available for download at Gelly’s home page.

With the current pace of technology I now expect to see computers defeating human professionals playing even games in my lifetime…a vision both exciting and depressing.

I just installed MoGo on my laptop and played it a quick game, and I’m impressed, it played some moves so good it was spooky…but MoGo’s yose sucks. OTOH I made MoGo play white…if I gave it 9 stones and more thinking time it would probably give this 8k a run for his money. I’ll try it, but not tonight.

why playing go is fun

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

takemiya masaki Takemiya Masaki 9P spoke to assembled participants at the 2008 U.S. Go Congress this afternoon at Portland State University. Here’s some of what he said during the first 30 minutes:

Everyone wants to get stronger at go and everyone wants to win games. Are you playing your moves at the first spot you wanted to play? Or do you change your mind because you think that move has problems? That kind of thinking keeps you from improving.

No one ever believes me when I say this.

The desire to win keeps you from playing the move you want to make. The move you want to play represents your own style. You can play one hundred games but if you don’t play your own moves it’s as if you played none.

Many people learn to not play their own moves because those moves have made them lose games. By sticking with your own moves, you may lose more, but eventually you will learn how to make these moves work and you will start winning. It is more satisfying to play the move you want to play. Don’t worry about losing.

Everyone has a different way of thinking about the game. The technical aspects of go are not that important. The game has infinite possibilities. What’s important is the way you think and feel about the game.

You think that professionals are reading ahead and considering variations — no. Thinking ahead too much is detrimental. Not just about go but life in general. So pros aren’t thinking, they are developing a feel for the game. They are thinking about the game at the speed of sound, but feeling the game at the speed of light.

Getting stronger is gradual; nobody starts out strong. Strong and weak players think about the game differently. A beginner is thinking about where to play and will it work or not. A pro isn’t thinking about where to play, but about what’s important on the board.

Understanding potential threats also is important. If your body is unhealthy, it restricts your movement. Go is similar. If your groups are healthy they can fight well. Sometimes you have weak stones, this affects your play. Learn good vs. bad shapes. Good shape wins more games.

People think that having the most territory wins games — no. I blame go books for this misconception. It’s not who has the most territory who wins — it’s who has the most territory at the end of the game. So don’t play territorial moves, play shape moves. With many good shapes you will win naturally.

Why is go fun? One reason is because every game is different. In many situations in life, uncertainty brings anxiety. But life is enjoyable because it’s unpredictable. If you knew what was going to happen for the rest of your life, why bother to live it? Not knowing what’s going to happen makes it more fun. Every go game is like a journey to a new place. And it’s fun to discover cool new moves.

Play with courage, not with fear.

–Takemiya Masaki, 2008-August-05

playing with similarities

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008

Q: How is playing guitar like shooting pool?
A: They’re both all about leave.

Viz. when playing guitar, in order to sound like less of a klutz and move smoothly to the next note or chord, the player needs to be thinking ahead about which fingers will be used in that next note or chord…and that means making sure those fingers are available by using other fingers now.

And when shooting pool, in order to sink more than a single ball, the player needs to be thinking ahead about positioning the cue ball to leave makeable shots.

Q: how is playing tennis like playing go?
A: they both can be approached using a certain style of play; i.e. keep making good returns or moves and wait for your opponent to make a mistake — then capitalize on it. With each mistake your opponent makes, he or she is more likely to try to overcompensate…to your advantage.

a new go proverb

Monday, December 3rd, 2007

Yesterday during the third round of the Seattle Go Center’s monthly ratings tournament, while pondering my next move the following words crossed my mind: “Don’t have too much fun!”

That struck me as having the tone of a proverb. So I hereby submit it as one.

What it means is, don’t let the joy of pursuit get you so wrapped up that you forget to coldly calculate the balance of the game. I suppose this is just another variation on “Always consider the whole board”, but with a psychological bent.

OK gotta go.

placing third in portland

Monday, November 5th, 2007

The Portland Open Go Tournament was hosted at Lewis and Clark College this past weekend. This frog took third place in the single-digit kyu division (my record was 3-2 but I was 3-1 going into the last round, which I lost to M. Malveaux). Here are the complete results as posted by TD Peter Drake:

Dan, 1: Jang Bi
2: Chang Yu
3: Zhao Yan

1-9 kyu, 1: Lucas Carlson
2: Jeremiah Burley
3: Frank Brown

10+ kyu, 1: Richard Steinfeld
2: Gordon Costanza
3: Robert Solovay

Youth: Mike Tobias
Female: Akane Negishi
New: Chang Yu

Making the weekend complete, I spent the evenings socializing with S and our good friends C, C, C’s new beau R, and the J/T/M/G unit. I enjoyed playing C’s mandolin and made a short video of leaves falling from a tree. An awesome weekend for sure.

2007 Go Congress wrapup: everyone’s a wiener

Saturday, August 4th, 2007

Well allright, not everyone. Last night’s final round of the Ing Masters tournament was an exciting game between Mingjiu Jiang 7P vs Feng Yun 9P. Jiang won by 3 points after Yun failed to kill his giant white dragon. Pros provided running analysis in the Galley as people watched the KGS live broadcast on video projection: Ing tournament

But enough about the pros; how I did in the U.S. Open? Here are the frog’s results:

  1. lost vs Frederick Argenio
  2. won vs Matt Palumbo
  3. lost vs Kelsey Dyer
  4. won vs Sean Reeves
  5. won vs Rachel Small
  6. lost vs James Shenko

Congratulations to my opponents who beat me. All I can say is I hope I learned from the games, it was a lot of fun, and wait ’til next year!

And speaking of next year, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that the 2008 USGC will be held in Portland Oregon, one of S and my favorite cities…and within driving distance to boot!

gome no go

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

I had hoped to record my U.S. Open tournament games this week using the gome program on my phone. Alas, it has fatal flaws, to wit:

  • it crashes with ‘Unhandled exception, close application?’ when I try to save a game to a file
  • it forgets moves and truncates games in Review mode

It should be possible to workaround one or the other of these bugs, but together they effectively stop me from game recording at the 2007 U.S. Go Congress, alas.

the game of improvement

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007

flower koOn the second day of the US Go Congress I won my tournament game and my mood brightened.

After the prior day’s loss I was gloomy, and resolved if I didn’t end up with at least a .500 record I would quit spending so much time on this game. After all, I’ve been stuck at 8k for over a year. Maybe I’ve hit the wall and am just too stupid to improve past this point. Looking around the crowded game room I am surrounded by hundreds of go players better than me. Depressing.

Winning my second game turned my mood around completely. I’m surprised at how much winning and losing influences my mood. I guess I’m a moody guy.

On the third day I lost again, bringing my record to 2-1. Gloom returns. Then at lunch a 1D from SLC sitting next to me offered to review my game. I replayed it for him from memory and he made several very instructive comments. The gloom is replaced by hope that improvement is possible, and I resolve to try and get as much value out of this week’s gathering as possible.

U.S. Go Congress kicks off @ Millersville

Sunday, July 29th, 2007

Go players of all ages and stripes descended on Millersville University campus last night, including A and I who arrived around midnite. A fierce three-hour thunderstorm kept many attendees up during the wee hours.

This morning’s round one of the six-round U.S. Open tournament followed tradition by starting over an hour late. After a nice start, a bad decision cost me my first tournament game by resignation.

After lunch I attended Juan Guo’s review of kyu games; she was entertaining as always. Pointing to a group of black stones in the middle of the board Guo asked the audience ‘How do you kill a fish?’…the answer was, ‘not with your hands, but with a net’.

It seemed so wonderful, but then…as the go players advanced to the cafeteria for supper, who should arrive ahead of them but zillions of highschool cheerleaders. The go players were totally outnumbered. An ignonimous moment, but is it prescient?